AUTHORIZATION

Role-based Access Control (RBAC)
for IAM systems

With cidaas RBAC, you can manage access through clearly defined roles and group.

This is for companies that expect more from role-based authorization.

Least Privilege Least Privilege
Governance Governance
Auditability Auditability

cidaas RBAC in IAM and CIAM environments

cidaas integrates role-based access control into a modern identity architecture. Organizations can define authorization rules based on business roles and supplementary attributes (Attribute-based Access Control ABAC) and apply them consistently across systems, applications, and digital processes.

Whether for controlling employee access in an IAM context or managing permissions in a CIAM environment, role-based authorization provides a clear and manageable model.

Since cidaas Authorization is part of a broader framework, RBAC can serve as an operational starting point – with the option to later expand to more dynamic models such as Policy-based Access Control PBAC.

lock icon
ACCESS Granted
admin key
Admin
24 permissions · 4 users
editor pencil
Editor
12 permissions · 18 users
viewer eye
Viewer
4 permissions · 142 users
shield Policy enforced in 12ms
live
The Architecture of Trust
Scalable Authorization Blueprint
U1
U2
U3
IDENTITIES
ACTIVE MAPPING
Defined Roles
Read Resource
Read Resource
Write Access
Write Access
Admin Portal
Admin Portal
Cloud API
Cloud API

Standardization of access decisions

cidaas RBAC is an authorization model in which access rights are assigned via roles rather than being managed individually for each user. Users are assigned one or more roles, and these roles determine which actions they are permitted to perform.

For IT teams, this approach means greater control while reducing operational complexity. It contributes to the standardization of access decisions, makes role assignment more repeatable, and improves transparency regarding who is allowed to access which resources.

In growing organizations, RBAC is becoming a practical method for uniformly managing authorization for internal and external identities and ensuring greater security.

Authorization. Leveled up.

Centralized access control

Manage permissions based on roles rather than individual users. This reduces administrative overhead and improves manageability.

Lower risk through clear logic

When permissions and rights are assigned on a role-based basis, access decisions become more consistent and misconfigurations are reduced.

Faster onboarding and change processes

New users and role changes can be efficiently mapped using predefined roles.

Improved auditability and compliance

Role-based methods facilitate reviews and ensure the tracability of access rights.

Scalability for growing organizations

This approach establishes a clear, defined role hierarchy, providing a stable foundation for access control across multiple systems.

How it works

Role-based access control in three deliberate steps.

01

Define roles

Map real responsibilities – Admin, Editor, Auditor – to bundles of permissions in the cidaas console or via API.

02

Assign to users or groups

Assign roles to individual users, AD/LDAP groups or whole tenants. Inheritance works the way you’d expect.

03

Enforce everywhere

Every login, every token, every API call is governed by scopes, claims, and context. Your apps just check – cidaas does the heavy lifting.

The foundation for various scenarios

Controlling employee access

Manage access based on departments, roles, and groups.

Partner and external access

Control access for external parties in a structured manner.

Securing applications and APIs

Control actions within applications and access permissions to files in a targeted, automated manner.

Complex organizational structures

Efficiently manage multiple units, departments, locations or brands.

Delegated administration

Empower business units, partners and other entities with context – offload central IT.

RBAC vs. ABAC vs. PBAC

Authorization models compared

RBAC

Role-based Access
Control

Access is definded through roles.
Permissions are grouped and assigned to users based on their function.

ABAC

Attribute-based Access
Control

Access is based on attributes.
Decisions consider user, resource, and contextual information.

PBAC

Policy-based Access
Control

Access is governed by policies.
Rules are centrally defined and consistently enforced across systems.

Identity Management plus – with cidaas RBAC

How it works

cidaas RBAC offers companies a structured authorization model without unnecessary complexity. Access is clearly defined, permissions are managed in a traceable manner, and control is maintained even as the system landscape grows.

Where it fits

As part of the comprehensive cidaas identity platform, RBAC fits into a modern authorization strategy that supports secure digital services, scalable identity management, and unified access control.

Why it matters

For companies looking to strengthen their authorization in IAM or CIAM environments, cidaas RBAC provides a practical and future-proof foundation.

cidaas RBAC is part of a comprehensive authorization strategy.

Standardized access. More control. More security.

cidaas is exclusively hosted in Europe.

Secure lock
AuthZEN AuthZEN
OAuth OAuth
EU EU Only
OIDC OIDC
Hosted in EU
Sovereign

FAQs: RBAC

Role-based Access Control is an authorization model in which permissions are assigned not directly to individual users, but to roles. Users are assigned roles based on their responsibilities, and these roles determine which actions and resources they are allowed to access.
No. RBAC is useful for businesses of all sizes, especially as the number of users, applications, or responsibilities grows.
Yes. RBAC can support Zero Trust by helping organizations define and enforce the principle of “least privilege.” In many environments, it serves as a foundational authorization method that can later be combined with stricter context-based and policy-based controls.
cidaas RBAC can be used to structure permissions for employees, partners, digital users, applications, APIs, and administrative processes. It is particularly well-suited for companies that want to align access rights with responsibilities and standardize permission management.
It is implemented by defining permissions for specific actions and resources and bundling them into roles. These roles are then assigned to users or groups, often based on attributes such as department, function, or area of responsibility.
In modern IAM and CIAM systems, implementation occurs via central identity platforms, APIs, and standards such as OAuth2 or OpenID Connect. A typical example is the definition of roles such as Administrator, Editor, or Viewer, each of which is granted different access rights to applications and data.
Scroll to Top