Policy-based access control PBAC – Dynamic access control for modern companies

Policy-based access control (PBAC) describes a modern approach to access control in which access rights are no longer assigned exclusively via fixed role models, but are determined via policy-based rules.

This enables companies to manage permissions more precisely, context-sensitively, and automatically.

PBAC becomes particularly relevant in the identity and access management environment when traditional role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) approaches reach their limits—for example, in complex organizations, rapidly growing platforms, or when strict security requirements apply.

PBAC vs. RBAC vs. ABAC?

Traditional role-based access control (RBAC) is based on predefined user roles. Users are granted access because they are assigned to a specific role, such as “HR employee” or “admin.” The RBAC model is used by many industries, but it reaches its limits when many roles, departments, and dynamic requirements come together.

Attribute-based access control (ABAC) uses attributes such as location, device type, department, or time. This makes authorization much more flexible, as rules can respond to user attributes or resource attributes.

Policy-based access control (PBAC) connects these two worlds and expands them: PBAC makes decisions based on context-dependent policies that incorporate business rules, identity, user attributes, roles, company policies, and external factors.

This allows organizations to precisely control access requests – without exploding role models or confusing authorization structures.

ReBac: Relationship-based Access Control

A related approach is ReBAC (Relationship-based Access Control). Here, the focus is on relationships between users, groups, systems, or resources.
Examples:

• An employee gains access to data because they are part of a project team.
• A partner company gains access because there is a cooperation agreement.

ReBAC complements PBAC perfectly because it can also map relationships in policies—for example, in complex business processes or B2B identity structures.

How does PBAC work?

PBAC is based on policies, which define:

• Who (identity, user attributes, roles)
• What (resources, applications, data)
• Under what conditions (context, place, security level device)
• For what purpose (access request, business rules) one would like to obtain access.

The process of access authorization follows these four steps:

1. The user submits a request for access. This can be a login, a file retrieval, or an API call.
2. IAM-System collects attributes, including identity, roles, context, time, device, and location.
3. PBAC Engine reviews the guideline. Business rules and security guidelines are applied in this process.
4. Finally, the authorization decision is made: allow, restrict, or deny access.

An example of this would be: Allow access to resource X if the user is from the Finance department AND is located within the EU AND the access request is made during business hours.

The basis for this access request is a flexible policy framework that administrators can manage centrally via an identity and access management platform.

PBAC offers these advantages

PBAC offers various benefit for companies, who need dynamic and secure access control:

• Higher flexibility: Permissions are dynamically controlled by policy-based rules. This proves ideal for agile organizations.
• Less role-explosions: RBAC models tend to generate thousands of roles. PBAC significantly reduces this complexity.
• Context-based security: Access is controlled based on location, risk, behavior, or device—perfect for zero-trust architectures.
• Better control options: Administrators can map business requirements directly to policies without IT workarounds.
• Harmonious combination with RBAC & ABAC: PBAC supplements existing models rather than replacing them.
• Precise authorization for sensitive resources: Especially in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, or public administration, it is possible to control access rights with fine granularity.

The following PBAC challenges must be taken into account

Despite the advantages, there are also disadvantages that companies should be aware of:

• More complex implementation: Policy models must be carefully planned. PBAC is not a plug-and-play approach.
• Need for clear business rules: Without defined processes and responsibilities, policies become unclear.
• Higher demands on IAM systems: Not every (C)IAM supports PBAC comprehensively.
• Governance & control: Policies must be regularly reviewed and versioned to avoid misconfigurations.

Zero Trust & PBAC: Why the two are inextricably linked

Zero Trust is now considered the security standard whereby no user, no system, and no network access is automatically trusted. Policy-based access control (PBAC) provides the ideal basis for this, as access decisions are made based on clear policies, user attributes, and contextual information.

This authorization model enables organizations to continuously review access rights based on risk, location, device, or data sensitivity. This dynamic access control goes far beyond traditional RBAC or ABAC models and supports zero trust concepts such as “never trust, always verify”.

PBAC in microservice and API architectures

In distributed systems, microservices, and cloud environments, authorization and security requirements are increasing significantly. Every API request represents an access point—and this is precisely where PBAC offers decisive advantages.

Policies define in detail which user, which device, or which service may access which API under which conditions. Attributes such as risk, service identity, client, or access path are checked in real time. Companies benefit from improved API security und einer höheren Flexibilität.

PBAC makes sense for these corporate structures

The authorization model is particularly suitable for organizations that:

• Complex structures or multiple departments
• Dynamic access requirements
• Zero-trust or cloud-first strategies
• Work with sensitive data or compliance requirements
• Operate APIs, microservices, or IoT environments
• Need to manage mixed B2B/B2C access

Possible application areas:

• Analysis of business rules
• Consolidation of existing role and attribute systems
• Creation of initial policies and test scenarios
• Automated administration and monitoring
• Regular review processes

PBAC Tools & implementation in IAM-platforms

Modern IAM platforms enable the definition of complex policies that combine user attributes, device data, roles, business rules, and security context. Administrators can centrally manage, version, and roll out policies across all applications.

Effective PBAC deployment requires:

✔ A flexible policy engine

✔ An IAM with API-first architecture

✔ Contextual data (risk, location, device)

✔ Clearly defined access requirements

✔ A role and attribute model that supports PBAC

This makes PBAC a scalable control framework for modern companies.

PBAC in CIAM systems: Flexible access control for customers, partners, and users

In the B2C environment, too, the demand for personalized and secure access is increasing. Traditional role-based access control is often insufficient for this purpose, as customer roles and external user groups are dynamic.

PBAC enables CIAM platforms to control access rights via policies that incorporate attributes such as customer status, location, risk, or linked accounts. This enables companies to map personalized customer journeys while ensuring that sensitive data remains accessible only to specific users.

PBAC and Machine Learning: The future of dynamic access control

Policy-based access control is becoming increasingly intelligent and context-sensitive thanks to machine learning. While PBAC is based on clearly defined guidelines, machine learning can identify patterns in user behavior, access requests, or risks and incorporate these findings into the authorization process.

In modern IAM systems, such models supplement existing policies by:

• Detect anomalies in real time (e.g., suspicious location changes)
• Make risk-based decisions (risk-based access)
• Calculate dynamic attributes, e.g., “RiskScore” or “ConfidenceLevel”
• Enable adaptive access control that adapts to user behavior

Areal world example:

A user attempts to access sensitive resources—but from an unfamiliar IP region or at unusual times. Although PBAC rules would allow access under normal circumstances, machine learning classifies the context as risky. The policy can thus automatically trigger an additional authentication factor or deny access.

Policy-based access control as the new standard?

Despite some advantages, it is important to emphasize that PBAC is not a replacement for RBAC or ABAC – but rather a logical further development. By assigning access rights via context-based, rule-driven policies, companies gain flexible, secure, and future-proof access control.

Whether for employees, partners, or customers, the model creates the basis for transparent, scalable, and dynamic authorization processes in identity and access management.

Companies that rely on modern architectures such as zero trust, APIs, or the cloud will find it difficult to avoid this authorization model in the future.

Would you like to see cidaas in action? Book a free demo with us. You are also welcome to contact our experts with any questions you may have.